Chubby but cheery? Investigating the compensatory judgments of high, medium, and low status weight groups in Malaysia
Publication Date
July 23, 2016
Creator
Abstract
We examined two strategies that people use in their social judgements – indifference and compensation. Given their average position we reasoned that an indifference strategy would characterise perceivers’ competence vs. warmth judgements of members of intermediate status groups because they do not possess features that deviate from normality. In contrast, high and low status groups deviate from normality, and we reasoned that an attention to the negative aspects of their competence vs. warmness should enlist a complimentary desire to compensate such groups in the opposite dimension, in line with societal norms of politeness. Results from Study 1 showed mixed support for these assumptions: Compensation was used for underweight faces (intermediate group) and ideal weight faces (high status), while an indifference strategy was used in the judgements of the overweight (low status) which we reasoned may be tied to cultural and individual differences. When these noise were removed in Studies 2a and 2b, we showed, consistent with our assumptions that the indifference strategy was used in the evaluations of the underweight (intermediate status), while compensation was used for the ideal-(high status) and over-weight (low status) categories. Finally, Study 2b showed that norms of politeness predicted the use of compensation, but only for the overweight low status category.
Item Type
ethesis
Thesis Type
MPhil
Supervisors
Subjects (LC)
Associated Schools / Departments
School of Psychology (MY)
eprints ID
34003
UoN Repository URI
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Name
10june16 - Master of Philosophy report[Wong Kang Xin].pdf
Type
Full-text
Description
Examined
Size
876.1 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
a225641eacb1e9e80f67944d81d2ac27